Register
Forgot your password?

Modern ultrasound technologies and their application in surgical treatment of patients with cardial diseases and increased surgical risk. Part 1. Open cardiac surgery

Authors: Bogachevskaya S.A., Kuznetsov A.N., Bogachevskiy A.N.

Company: 1 Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Khabarovsk, 680009, Russian Federation
2 Far Eastern State Medical University, Khabarovsk, 680000, Russian Federation

For correspondence:  Sign in or register.

Type:  Reviews


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1997-3187-2021-15-1-87-98

For citation: Bogachevskaya S.A., Kuznetsov A.N., Bogachevskiy A.N. Modern ultrasound technologies and their application in surgical treatment of patients with cardial diseases and increased surgical risk. Part 1. Open cardiac surgery. Creative Cardiology. 2021; 15 (1): 87–98 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2021-15-1-87-98

Received / Accepted:  18.03.2021 / 24.03.2021

Keywords: echocardiography cardiovascular surgery open cardiac surgery

Full text:  

 

Abstract

The increased surgical risk of standard cardiac surgery in patients with complicated cardiovascular diseases and comorbid conditions forces us to fined safer ways to correct the pathology of the heart and vessels. The article shows various methods of open and mini-invasive heart surgery among patients with increased surgical risk and need in echocardiographic support. An appearance of new methods of surgical correction, as well as new devices for minimally invasive and endovascular interventions, need in the control of increasingly accurate and spatial ultrasound imaging, such as transesophageal echocardiography, three-dimensional echocardiography, threedimensional transesophageal echocardiography, modes of rapid and accurate image post-processing. Types of surgery performed in the Khabarovsk Federal Center of cardiovascular surgery, and presented in this review. These types supplemented by clinical examples with illustrations of echocardiographic images and the results of surgery. A significant reduction in the time of forming a three-dimensional echocardiographic image and obtaining postprocessing results will allow the surgeon to receive high-quality information about the heart structures quickly. Such approach will become a guarantee of understanding between the diagnostician and the surgeon in a specialized surgical hospital.

References

  1. Belov Yu.V., Isaev R.M. Risk stratification in cardiovascular surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery (Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova). 2014; 7: 78–81 (in Russ.).
  2. Shikhverdiev N.N., Ushakov D.I., Peleshok A.S., Krivopalov V.A., Sizenko V.A. Biological age and its role in stratification of cardiac risk. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2019; 178 (1): 17–20 (in Russ.).
  3. Prediction and prevention of cardiac complications of extracardiac surgery. National guidelines. Developed by the Committee of Experts. (Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention). 2011; 10 (6): 1–28 (in Russ.).
  4. Falk V., Cheng D.C.H., Martin J., Lal A., Diegeler A., Folliguet T.A. et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. A meta95 Креативная кардиология. 2021; 15 (1) DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2021-15-1-87-98
  5. Flachskampf F.A., Badano L., Daniel W.G., Feneck R.O., Fox K.F., Fraser А. et al. Recommendations for transoesophageal echocardiography: update 2010. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2010; 11: 557–76. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq057
  6. Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Tsang W., Adams D.H., Agricola E., Buck T. et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using threedimensional echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2012; 13 (1): 1–46. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jer316
  7. Lang R.M., Tsang W., Weinert L., Mor-Avi V., Chandra S. Valvular heart disease. The value of 3-dimensional echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011; 58 (19): 1933–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.035
  8. Nishimura R.A., Otto C.M., Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Erwin J.P., Fleisher L.A. et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2017; 135 (25): e1159–95. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503
  9. Soliman O.I., Anwar A.M., Metawei A.K., McGhie J.S., Geleijnse M.L., Ten Cate F.J. New scores for the assessment of mitral stenosis using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep. 2011; 4: 370–7. DOI: 10.1007/s12410-011-9099-z
  10. Hahn R.T., Abraham T., Adams M.S., Bruce C.J., Glas K.E., Lang R.M. et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2013; 26 (9): 921-64. https://www.asecho.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2013_Performing-Comprehensive-TEE.pdf (дата обращения 17.08.2020) accessed August 17, 2020).
  11. Tan T.C., Hung J.W. Standard transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography views of mitral pathology that every surgeon should know. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2015; 4: 449–60. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.03.05
  12. Lancellotti P., Moura L., Pierard L.A., Agricola E., Popescu B.A., Tribouilloy C. et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2010; 11 (4): 307-32. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq031
  13. Lancellotti P., Tribouilloy C., Hagendorff A., Popescu B.A., Edvardsen T., Pierard L.A. et al. Scientific Document Committee of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2013; 14: 611–44. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet105
  14. Zoghbi W.A., Adams D., Bonow R.O., EnriquezSarano M., Foster E., Grayburn P.A. et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation. A report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2017; 30 (4): 303–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007
  15. Nurbay Zh.N., Novikov V.K., Gordeev M.L. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of subvalvular structures. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2010; 6: 97-100 (in Russ.). 16. Anwar A.M. Understanding the role of echocardiography in the assessment of mitral valve disease. E-journal of Cardiology Practice. 2018; 16 (20). Available at: https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-ofCardiology-Practice/Volume-16/Understandingthe-role-of-echocardiography-in-the-assessment-ofmitral-valve-disease (accessed August 17, 2020).
  16. Baumgartner H., Falk V., Bax J.J., De Bonis M., Hamm C., Holm P.J. et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. The Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery. Eur. Heart J. 2017; 38 (36): 2739–91. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391
  17. Camm A.J., Lüscher T.F., Serruys P.W. ESC Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 3rd ed. England: Blackwell Publishing; 2011.
  18. Castillo J.G., Solís J., González-Pinto Á., Adams D.H. Surgical echocardiography of the mitral valve. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2011; 64 (12): 1169–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2011.06.023
  19. Iribarne A., Karpenko A., Russo M.J., Cheema F. Eight-year experience with minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. World J. Surg. 2009; 34 (4): 611–5. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0260-7
  20. Tan T.C., Hung J.W. Standard transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography views of mitral pathology that every surgeon should know. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2015; 4: 449–60. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.03.05
  21. Faletra F.F., Leo L.A., Paiocchi V.L., Caretta А., Viani G.M., Schlossbauer S.A. et al. Anatomy of mitral annulus insights from non-invasive imaging techniques. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2019; 20 (8): 843–57. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez153
  22. Cerin G., Popa A.B., Ticulescu R., Diena M. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: from echo assessment to surgical strategy and techniques. In: Hot topics in echocardiography. London, UK: Intech Open Limited; 2013: 65–99. DOI: 10.5772/56062
  23. Wunderlich N.C., Beigel R., Siegel R.J. Management of mitral stenosis using 2d and 3d echodoppler imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6: 1191–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.07.008
  24. Zoghbi W.A., Enriquez-Sarano M., Foster E., Grayburn P.A., Kraft C.D., Levine R.A. et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2003; 16 (7): 777–802. DOI: 10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00335-3
  25. Baumgartner H., Hung J., Bermejo J. et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2009; 22 (1): 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029
  26. Zamorano J.L., Gonçalves A. Three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of valvular heart disease. Heart. 2013; 99: 811–8. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302046
  27. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. The Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018; 23 (7): 103–55. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2018- 7-103-155
  28. Agricola E., Oppizzi M., Maiseno F. Echocar-diographic classification of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation caused by restricted motion according to tethering pattern. Eur. J. Echocardiog. 2003; 5: 326–34.
  29. Calafiore A.M., Gallina S., Di Mauro M. Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001; 71: 1146–52.
  30. Chragyan V.A., Myalyuk P.A., Arutyunyan V.B., Dyachkov S.I. Basic principles of diagnostics and surgery of ischemic mitral insufficiency. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center. 2017, 12 (2): 42–6 (in Russ.).
  31. Andrianova A.M., Saidova M.A. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: modern evaluation criteria based on transthoracic echocardiography. Medical Care. 2015; 3: 93–102 (in Russ.).
  32. Nurbay Zh.N., Novikov V.K., Gordeev M.L. Influence of preservation of subvalvular structures during mitral prosthetics on intracardiac hemodynamics. Arterial hypertension). 2012; 18 (5): 467–9. DOI: 10.18705/1607-419X-2012-18-5-467-469 (in Russ.).
  33. Shevchenko Yu.L., Popov L.V., Emel'yanov V.V. Classification of interventions for mitral valve prosthetics with full or partial preservation of its structures. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. 2006; 3: 24 (in Russ.).
  34. Ivanov V.A., Popov S.O., Nikityuk T.G. Mitral valve replacement with anterior leaflet translocation. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015; 8 (1): 70–2. DOI: 10.17116/kardio20158170-72 (in Russ.).

About Authors

  • Svetlana A. Bogachevskaya, Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Cardiologist, Functional and Ultrasonic Diagnostician, ORCID
  • Aleksey N. Kuznetsov, Сardiovascular Surgeon, Head of Department, ORCID
  • Aleksandr N. Bogachevskiy, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Functional Diagnostician, ORCID

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery


Sort by