Outcomes and results of on- and off-pump coronaryartery bypass grafting. Advantages and disadvantagesof methods according to randomized trials data

Authors: Shumkov K.V.

Company: Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rublevskoe shosse, 135, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation

For correspondence:  Sign in or register.

Type:  Ischemic heart disease


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1997-3187-2018-12-1-22-30

For citation: Shumkov K.V. Outcomes and results of on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Advantages and disadvantages of methods according to randomized trials data. Creative Cardiology (Kreativnaya Kardiologiya). 2018; 12 (1): 22–30 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2018-12-1-22-30.

Received / Accepted:  November 15, 2017 / November 20, 2017

Keywords: bypass grafting on-pump off-pump ischemic heart disease

Full text:  

 

Abstract

The review is devoted to the actual problem – a comparative analysis of modern randomized trials comparing the results of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. In addition to analyzing the “primary” end points – overall and cardiac mortality, the author considers the comparative results of neurocognitive impairments, quality of life, different age groups, fragile status and others.

References

  1. Shumkov K.V., Lefterova N.P., Pak N.L., Kakuchaya T.T., Smirnova Yu.Yu., Polunina A.G. et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in conditions of artificial circulation and on the working heart: comparative analysis of immediate and long-term results and postoperative complications (cardiac arrhythmias, cognitive and neurological disorders, rheological features and hemostatic system condition). Creative Cardiology (Kreativnaya Kardiologiya). 2009; 1: 28–49 (in Russ.).

  2. Calafiore M. et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996; 6 (5): 1545–48.

  3. Jansen E.W. et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass using the octopus method: results in the first one hundred patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998; 116 (1): 60–7.

  4. Houlind K., Kjeldsen B.J., Madsen S.N. et al. Onpump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients: results from the Danish On-pump versus Off-pump Randomization Study. Circulation. 2012; 125: 2431–9.

  5. Houlind K., Kjeldsen B.J., Madsen S.N. et al. The impact of avoiding cardiopulmonary by-pass during coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients: the Danish On-pump Off-pump Randomisation Study (DOORS). Trials. 2009; 10: 47.

  6. Van der Linden W. Pitfalls in randomized surgical trials. Surgery. 1980; 87: 258–62.

  7. Song H.K., Petersen R.J., Sharoni E., Guyton R.A., Puskas J.D. Safe evolution towards routine off-pump coronary artery bypass: negotiating the learning curve. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003; 24: 947–52.

  8. Brown P.P., Mack M.J., Simon A.W. et al. Comparing clinical outcomes in highvolume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001; 72: S1009–15. 9. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 350: 1791–3.

  9. Lamy A., Devereaux P.J., Prabhakaran D. et al. Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016; 375: 2359–68.

  10. Novitzky D., Shroyer A.L., Collins J.F. et al. A study design to assess the safety and efficacy of on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass grafting: the ROOBY trial. Clin. Trials. 2007; 4: 81–91.

  11. Shroyer A.L., Grover F.L., Hattler B. et al. Onpump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009; 361: 1827–37.

  12. Diegeler A., Börgermann J., Kappert U. et al. Offpump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 368: 1189–98.

  13. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16: 199–208.

  14. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996; 37: 53–72.

  15. Hachinski V., Iadecola C., Petersen R.C. et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2220–41.

  16. Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Be′dirian V. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005; 53: 695–9.

  17. Kaplan E., Fein D., Morris R., Delis D. The WAIS-R as a neuropsychological instrument. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1991.

  18. Fontbonne A., Berr C., Ducimetie`re P., Alpe′rovitch A. Changes in cognitive abilities over a 4-year period are unfavorably affected in elderly diabetic subjects: results of the Epidemiology of Vascular Aging Study. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 366–70.

  19. Hochstenbach J.B., Anderson P.G., van Limbeek J., Mulder T.T. Is there a relation between neuropsychologic variables and quality of life after stroke? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1360–6.

  20. Storandt M., Botwinick J., Danziger W.L., Berg L., Hughes C.P. Psychometric differentiation of mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch. Neurol. 1984; 41: 497–9.

  21. Larrabee G.J., Largen J.W., Levin H.S. Sensitivity of age-decline resistant (“hold”) WAIS subtests to Alzheimer's disease. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1985; 7: 497–504.

  22. Lamy A., Devereaux P.J., Prabhakaran D. et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366: 1489–97.

  23. Lamy A., Devereaux P.J., Prabhakaran D. et al. Effects of Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary- Artery Bypass Grafting at 1 Year. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 368: 1179–88.

  24. Smith C.R., Leon M.B., Mack M.J. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 364: 2187–98.

  25. Kodali S.K., Williams M.R., Smith C.R. et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366: 1686–95.

  26. Makaryus A., Dhama B., Raince J. et al. Coronary artery diameter as a risk factor for acute coronary syndromes in Asian-Indians. Am. J. Cardiol. 2005; 96: 778–80.

  27. Lip G.Y., Rathore V.S., Katira R., Watson R.D., Singh S.P. Do Indo-Asians have smaller coronary arteries? Postgrad. Med. J. 1999; 75: 463–6.

  28. Dhawan J., Bray C.L. Are Asian coronary arteries smaller than Caucasian? A study on angiographic coronary artery size estimation during life. Int. J. Cardiol. 1995; 49: 267–9.

  29. Head S.J., Davierwala P.M., Serruys P.W. et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final fiveyear follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur. Heart J. 2014; 35: 2821–30.

  30. Farkouh M.E., Domanski M., Sleeper L.A. et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 367: 2375–84.

  31. Van Dijk D., Spoor M., Hijman R. et al. Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs onpump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2007; 297: 701–8.

  32. Hueb W., Lopes N.H., Pereira A.C. et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump stable multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: the MASS III Trial. Circulation. 2010; 122 (Suppl.): S48–52.

  33. Puskas J.D., Williams W.H., O'Donnell R. et al. Off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting are associated with similar graft patency, myocardial ischemia, and freedom from reintervention: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011; 91: 1836–42.

  34. Kim J.B., Yun S.-C., Lim J.W. et al. Longterm survival following coronary artery bypass grafting: offpump versus on-pump strategies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014; 63: 2280–8.

  35. Alukayli M., Buth K., Legare J. Offpump CABG surgery is associated with a worse long term mortality than on-pump CABG: result from a randomized trial comparing grafting strategies. Can. J. Cardiol. 2015; 31: S110.

  36. Hu S., Zheng Z., Yuan X. et al. Increasing longterm major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a singlecenter prospective observational study. Circulation. 2010; 121: 1800–8.

  37. Lazar H.L. Should off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting be abandoned? Circulation. 2013; 128: 406–13.

  38. Sabik J. Should off-pump CABG be abandoned? CTSNet. 2016. http://www.ctsnet.org/article/should-pump-cabg-be-abandoned (accessed 17.08.2017).

About Authors

Shumkov Konstantin Valer'evich, Cand. Med. Sc., Cardiovascular Surgeon

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery