Трансрадиальный доступ при катетеризации сердца: подводные камни, методы профилактики и лечения
Авторы:
Организация:
ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева» Минздрава России, Москва, Российская Федерация
Для корреспонденции: Сведения доступны для зарегистрированных пользователей.
Тип статьи: Редакционная статья
DOI:
УДК: 616.12-089.819.5
Для цитирования: Петросян К.В., Голухова Е.З., Гончарова Е.С. Трансрадиальный доступ при катетеризации сердца: подводные камни, методы профилактики и лечения. Креативная кардиология. 2023; 17 (2): 177–88. DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2023-17-2-177-188
Поступила / Принята к печати: 26.06.2023 / 26.06.2023
Ключевые слова:
Скачать (Download)
Аннотация
Лучевой доступ в последнее десятилетие получил широкое распространение при выполнении коронарных интервенций, как диагностической, так и лечебной направленности. Подобная тенденция обусловлена более низкой частотой осложнений при использовании лучевого доступа в сравнении с трансфеморальным доступом. То обстоятельство, что сегодняшний низкий уровень осложнений был достигнут по мере освоения эндоваскулярными специалистами техники трансрадиального доступа, свидетельствует о необходимости изучения всех технических нюансов его исполнения, возможных осложнений и методов их профилактики и лечения.Тем не менее значительное увеличение объема выполняемых эндоваскулярных процедур через трансрадиальный доступ приводит к повышению абсолютного числа осложнений, связанных с ним. Важность превентивных мер по их профилактике обусловлена необходимостью сохранения функционирующей лучевой артерии для повторных эндоваскулярных доступов, для использования лучевой артерии в качестве коронарного кондуита или для наложения фистулы в случае необходимости перевода пациента на постоянный гемодиализ. Данный обзор посвящен основным осложнениям, связанным с применением трансрадиального доступа, а также мерам по их профилактике и лечению.
Литература
- Aoun J., Hattar L., Dgayli K., Wong G., Bhat T. Update on complications and their management during transradial cardiac catheterization. Expert. Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2019; 17 (10): 741–51. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1675510
- Kolkailah A.A., Alreshq R.S., Muhammed A.M., Zahran M.E., Anas El-Wegoud M., Nabhan A.F. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018; 4 (4): CD012318. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012318.pub2
- Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S., Antunes M.J., BucciarelliDucci C., Bueno H., et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart J. 2018; 39 (2): 119–77. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
- Roy S., Kabach M., Patel D.B., Guzman L.A., Jovin I.S. Radial artery access complications: prevention, diagnosis and management. Cardiovasc. Revascularization. Med. 2022; 40: 163–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.007
- Caputo R.P., Tremmel J.A., Rao S., Gilchrist I.C., Pyne C., Pancholy S. et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011; 78: 823–39. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23052
- Curtis E., Fernandez R., Khoo J., Weaver J., Lee A., Halcomb E. Correction: clinical predictors and management for radial artery spasm: an Australian cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2023; 23 (1): 90. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03119-9
- Deftereos S., Giannopoulos G., Kossyvakis C., Driva M., Kaoukis A., Raisakis K. et al. Radial artery flow-mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011; 77: 649–54. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22688
- Alkagiet S., Petroglou D., Nikas D.N., Kolettis T.M. Access-site complications of the transradial approach: rare but still there. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2020; 17 (3): 279–93. DOI: 10.2174/1573403x16999200819101923
- Pancholy S.B., Karuparthi P.R., Gulati R. A novel nonpharmacologic tech- nique to remove entrapped radial sheath. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015; 85: E35–8. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25593
- Alkagiet S., Petroglou D., Nikas D.N., Kolettis T.M. Access-site complications of the transradial approach: rare but still there. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2020; 17 (3): 279–93. DOI: 10.2174/157340 3x16999200819101923
- Elattar M.Z., Bastwisy R.B., Haseeb W.A., Salama M.K. Topical lidocaine and/or intravenous midazolam before radial coronary angiography to prevent radial artery spasm. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2023; 73 (4): S103–8. DOI: 10.47391/jpma.egy-s4-22
- Black W., Baljepally R., Shali L., Alsharif O., Warden S., Heidel E., et al. Old is (not) gold: midazolam monotherapy versus midazolam plus fentanyl for sedation during cardiac catheterization. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2021; 2021: 9932171. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9932171
- Deftereos S., Giannopoulos G., Raisakis K., Hahalis G., Kaoukis A., Kossyvakis C., et al. Moderate procedural sedation and opioid analgesia during transradial coronary interventions to prevent spasm: A prospective randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013; 6 (3): 267–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin. 2012.11.005
- Sandoval Y., Bell M.R., Gulati R. Transradial artery access complications. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019; 12 (11). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007386
- Seto A.H., Roberts J.S., Abu-Fadel M.S., Czak S.J., Latif F., Jain S.P., et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (Radial Artery Access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015; 8 (2): 283– 91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.036
- Moussa Pacha H., Alahdab F., Al-khadra Y., Idris A., Rabbat F., Darmoch F., et al. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. Heart J. 2018; 204: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.007
- Shroff A.R., Gulati R., Drachman D.E., Feldman D.N., Gilchrist I.C., Kaul P., et al. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020; 95 (2): 245–52. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28672
- Rathore S., Stables R.H., Pauriah M., Hakeem A., Mills J.D., Palmer N.D., et al. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010; 3 (5): 475–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.009
- Borrie A., Fairley S., Harding S.A., Dens J. First experience using the sheathless hyperion guiding catheter system designed for direct insertion. J. Interv. Cardiol. Published online 2022: 5668728. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5668728
- Borrie A., Raina A., Fairley S., Ranchord A., Harding S.A. Use of the sheathless eaucath is an effective strategy to overcome resistant severe radial spasm. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2023; 2023: 2434516. DOI: 10.1155/2023/2434516
- Mason P.J., Shah B., Tamis-Holland J.E., Bittl J.A., Cohen M.G., Safirstein J., et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018; 11 (9): 35. DOI: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035
- Patel T., Shah S., Pancholy S., Rao S., Bertrand O.F., Kwan T. Balloon-assisted tracking: a must-know technique to overcome difficult anatomy during transradial approach. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014; 83 (2): 211–20. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24959
- Andreou A.Y. Double perforation of an anomalous radial artery tackled with balloon-assisted tracking and guide catheter tamponade. Hell. J. Cardiol. 2018; 59 (4): 241–3. DOI: 10.1016/J.HJC.2017.12.007
- Sadler M., Lawson C., Sadler M., Lawson C. Cardiac catheterisation: avoiding common pitfalls with transradial vascular access. Br. J. Cardiol. 2023; 30 (3): 1–5. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2023.021
- Sawant A.C., Rizik D.G., Rao S.V., Pershad A. Algorithms for challenging scenarios encountered in transradial intervention. Indian Heart J. 2021; 73 (2): 149–55. DOI: 10.1016/j. ihj.2020.09.012
- Tizón-Marcos H., Barbeau G.R. Incidence of compartment syndrome of the arm in a large series of transradial approach for coronary procedures. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2008; 21 (5): 380–4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00361.x
- Bigler M.R., Buffle E., Rappo M.V., Grossenbacher R., Tschannen C., Seiler C. Association of palmar arch collateral function and radial artery occlusion after transradial access. Am. J. Cardiol. 2022; 168: 151–8. DOI: 10.1016/J.AMJCARD.2021.12.020
- Kotowycz M.A., Dẑavík V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012; 5 (1): 127–33. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965871
- Hahalis G.N., Leopoulou M., Tsigkas G., Xanthopoulou I., Patsilinakos S., Patsourakos N.G., et al. Multicenter randomized evaluation of high versus standard heparin dose on incident radial arterial occlusion after transradial coronary angiography: the SPIRIT OF ARTEMIS Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018; 11 (22): 2241–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.009
- Gu F., Yu J., Mi J. Radial arteriovenous fistula complicated with ischemic steal syndrome after transradial cardiac catheterization: a case report and literature review. BMC Surg. 2022; 22 (1). DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01562-7
- Sugahara T., Azuma M., Nakashima K., Ito K., Suzuki R., Hagio K., et al. Postcatheterization radial arteriovenous fistula: balloon-assisted direct percutaneous embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate and 50 % glucose solution in two sessions. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2013; 31 (7): 505–10. DOI: 10.1007/S11604-013-0206-8
- Aminian A., Sgueglia G.A., Wiemer M., Kefer J., Gasparini G.L., Ruzsa Z., et al. Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: the DISCO RADIAL Trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2022; 15 (12): 1191–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032
- Feghaly J., Chen K., Blanco A., Pineda A.M. Distal versus conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023; 101 (4): 722–36. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30602
- Senguttuvan N.B., Reddy P.M.K., Shankar P.H., Abdulkader R.S., Yallanki H.P., Kumar A., et al. Trans-radial approach versus trans-femoral approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2022; 17 (4): e0266709. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266709
- Rao S.V., Ou F.S., Wang T.Y., Roe M.T., Brindis R., Rumsfeld J.S., et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention. A report from the national cardiovascular data registry. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2008; 1 (4): 379–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007
- Valle J.A., Kaltenbach L.A., Bradley S.M., Yeh R.W., Rao S.V., Gurm H.S., et al. Variation in the adoption of transradial access for st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the NCDR CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017; 10 (22): 2242–54. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCIN.2017.07.020
- Ratib K., Mamas M.A., Anderson S.G., Bhatia G., Routledge H., De Belder M., et al. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015; 8 (1): 20–9. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcin.2014.06.026
- Алекян Б.Г., Григорьян А.М., Стаферов А.В., Карапетян Н.Г. Рентгенэндоваскулярная диагностика и лечение заболеваний сердца и сосудов в Российской Федерации – 2021 год. Эндоваскулярная хирургия. 2022; 9 (специальный выпуск): S5–254. DOI: 10.24183/2409-4080-2022-9S-S5-S254
- Kovach C., Banerjee S., Waldo S. Radial artery access for acute coronary syndromes: a review of current evidence. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2022; 24 (4): 383–92. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01656-x
- Huded C.P., Kapadia S.R., Ballout J.A., Krishnaswamy A., Ellis S.G., Raymond R., et al. Association of adoption of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST elevation myocardial infarction with door-to-balloon time. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020; 96 (2): E165–73. DOI: 10.1002/CCD.28785
- Singh S., Singh M., Grewal N., Khosla S. Transradial vs transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016; 32 (6): 777–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.08.019
- Mason P.J., Shah B., Tamis-Holland J.E., Bittl J.A. Cohen M.G., Safirstein J., et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018; 11 (9): 35. DOI: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035