Surgical treatment of acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation
Authors:
Company: Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation
For correspondence: Sign in or register.
Type: Reviews
DOI:
For citation: Zhalilov A.K., Salomov M.A. Surgical treatment of acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation. Creative Cardiology. 2020; 14 (1): 49–57 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2020-14-1-49-57
Received / Accepted: 05.03.2020/11.03.2020
Keywords: coronary artery bypass surgery acute coronary syndrome myocardial infarction angioplasty shunting emergency cardiology diabetes European Society of Cardiology
Abstract
Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are very heterogeneous group with different risks of cardiovascular events. Invasive coronary angiography is still the main diagnostic tool in these patients. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has the advantage of faster revascularization, lower risk of stroke and early discharge. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) allows a complete revascularization, consequently, reduces the need for a repeat revascularization.Approximately 10% of NSTE-ACS patients may require CABG during index hospitalization. NSTE-ACS patients undergoing CABG represent a challenging group, mainly because of balancing between ischaemic and bleeding risks in terms of surgery timing and perioperative antithrombotic therapy. Thus, whether to perform CABG or PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS should be discussed individually by Heart team. There is limited data comparing effectiveness of CABG versus PCI with drug-eluting stents in patients with NSTE-ACS. This article presents an overview of current clinical data regarding the role of various myocardial revascularization methods in patients with NSTE-ACS.
References
- Bockeria L.A., Golukhova E.Z., Sigaev I.Yu., Keren М.A. Modern approach towards surgical treatment of coronary heart disease in diabetic patients. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk (Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences). 2012; 67 (1): 20–6 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15690/vramn.v67i1.105
- Murray C.J., Lopez A.D. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997; 349 (9064): 1498–504. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2
- Simoons M.L. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: challenges for the medical profession. Opening address of the 2002 Congress European Society of Cardiology (editorial). Eur. Heart J. 2003; 24: 8–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00751-0
- ЭErlikh A.D. Registers of acute coronary syndromes – their types, characteristics and significance in clinical practice. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk (Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences). 2012; 67 (4): 30–9 DOI: 10.15690/vramn.v67i4.196(in Russ.).
- Sulimov V.A. Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation: modern diagnostic and treatment options. Atmosfera. Novosti Cardiologii (Atmosphere. Cardiology News). 2005; 3; 2–11 (in Russ.).
- Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 368 (21): 2004–13. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1216063
- McManus D.D., Gore J., Yarzebski J., Spencer F., Lessard D., Goldberg R.J. Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Am. J. Med. 2011; 124 (1): 40–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.07.023
- Terkelsen C.J., Lassen J.F., Norgaard B.L., Gerdes J.C., Jensen T., Gøtzsche L.B. et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur. Heart J. 2005; 26 (1): 18–26. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi002
- Hlatky M.A., Boothroyd D.B., Melsop K.A., Brooks M.M., Mark D.B., Pitt B. et al. Medical costs and quality of life 10 to 12 years after randomisation to angioplasty or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2004; 110 (14): 1960–6. DOI: 10.1116/01.CIR.0000143379.26342.50
- Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J.P., Mueller C., Valgimigli M., Andreotti F. et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 267–315. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
- Levine G.N., Bates E.R., Blankenship J.C., Bailey S.R., Bittl J.A., Cercek B. et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011; 124 (23): e2574–609. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.obo13e31823ba622
- Mårtensson S., Gyrd-Hansen D., Prescott E., Andersen P.K., Zwisler A.D., Osler M. Trends in time to invasive examination and treatment from 2001 to 2009 in patients admitted first time with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2014; 4 (1): e004052. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004052
- Ranasinghe I., Alprandi-Costa B., Chow V., Elliott J.M., Waites J., Counsell J.T. et al. Risk stratification in the setting of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes 1999–2007. Am. J. Cardiol. 2011; 108: 617–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.005
- Chang M., Lee C.W., Ahn J.M., Cavalcante R., Sotomi Y., Onuma J. et al. Comparison of outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stent implantation for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am. J. Cardiol. 2017; 120:380–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.038
- Neumann F.J., Sousa-Uva M., Ahlsson A., Alfonso F., Banning A.P., Benedetto U. et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. 2019; 40 (2): 87–165. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
- Ben-Gal Y., Moses J.W., Mehran R., Lansky A.J., Weisz G., Nikolsky E. et al. Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010; 3: 1059–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.1756
- Mennuni M.G., Dangas G.D., Mehran R., BenGal Y., Xu K., Généreux P. et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending artery treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Analysis from the ACUITY trial. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2015; 27 (10): 468–73.
- Brad Ya.B., Mazanov M.K., Timerbayev A.V., Sagirov M.A., Kharitonova N.I., Chymakov M.V. Long-term results of coronary bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Zhurnal Sklifosovskogo “Neotlozhnaya Meditsinskaya Pomoshch’” (Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”). 2017; 6 (3): 251–6 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-3-251-256
- Neumann A., Vöhringer L., Fischer J., Mustafi M., Schneider W., Krüger T., Schlensak K. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: focus on safety and completeness of revascularization. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677834
- Merzlyakov V.Yu., Skopin A.I., Mamedova S.K., Abadzhyan M.F., Gatamova N.A Coronary artery bypass surgery performed according to the vital indications in a patient with the decreased myocardial contractility. Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2013; 2: 32–5 (in Russ.).