Dysfunctions of the permanent pacemaker: the main causes, problems of diagnosis and prevention
Authors:
Company: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation
For correspondence: Sign in or register.
Type: Reviews
DOI:
For citation: Kadyraliev S.O., Baranovich V.Yu., Faybushevich A.G., Maksimkin D.A. Dysfunctions of the permanent pacemaker: the main causes, problems of diagnosis and prevention. Creative Cardiology. 2022; 16 (4): 483–96 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2022-16-4-483-496
Received / Accepted: 11.10.2022 / 14.11.2022
Keywords: pacemaker dysfunction of the pacemaker bradyarrhythmia diagnosis of dysfunctions of the pacemaker
Abstract
General concerns of diagnosis and correction of permanent pacemaker (PM) dysfunctions in patients with bradyarrhythmias are presented, based on the analysis of modern trials. Comorbidities of patients has been shown to contribute to more frequent occurrence of PM system dysfunctions. Moreover, the role of heart function, technical features of the pacemaker implantation procedure for the occurrence of PM system dysfunctions was noted. The most common types of dysfunctions, the main problems of their timely diagnosis, as well as possible methods of prevention of life-threatening conditions arising against the background of failure in the work of the PM are highlighted. Possible methods for the prevention of life-threatening conditions that occur against the background of a failure in the work of the pacemaker are proposed, which should be used when selecting patients for surgical treatment of bradyarrhythmias.
It is shown that information about the actual number and causes of dysfunctions of the РМ system remains insufficient. A large number of dysfunctions of implanted pacemakers remain undiagnosed and unregistered, which affects the quality of life, and can also pose a certain threat to the patient. Moreover, due attention is not paid to the features of РМ programming and timely diagnosis of problems in the РМ, which is a key problem in the development of dysfunctions. In this regard, it seems relevant to conduct further research aimed at studying the quality of life of patients with implanted permanent pacemakers in order to clarify additional mechanisms of dysfunction and improve measures to prevent them
References
- Cingolani E., Goldhaber J.I., Marbán E. Nextgeneration pacemakers: from small devices to biological pacemakers. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018; 15 (3): 139–50. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.165
- Mulpuru S.K., Madhavan M., McLeod C.J., Cha Y.M., Friedman P.A. Cardiac pacemakers: function, troubleshooting, and management: Part 1 of a 2-Part Series. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017; 69 (2): 189–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.061
- Sapelnikov O.V., Kulikov A.A., Cherkashin D.I., Grishin I.R., Nikolaeva O.A., Ardus D.F. et al. Removal of electrodes of implanted systems. Status of the problem. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2019; 23 (4): 47–52 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21688/1681-3472-2019-4-47-52
- Bowman H.C., Shannon K.M., Biniwale R., Moore J.P. Cardiac implantable device outcomes and lead survival in adult congenital heart disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021; 324: 52–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.027
- Shavarov A.A., Dzhandzhgava A.O., Ardashev A.V. Malfunction of pacemakers and defibrillators. In: Ardashev A.V. (Ed.) Clinical arrhythmology. Moscow; 2009 (in Russ.).
- Gomez-Polo J.C., Higueras Nafría J., MartínezLosas P., Can~adas-Godoy V., Bover-Freire R., Pérez-Villacastín J. Poor knowledge of potentially lethal electrocardiographic patterns in asymptomatic patients among noncardiologist physicians, and underestimation of their seriousness. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. (Engl. Ed). 2017; 70 (6): 507–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.09.021
- Domagała S., Domagała M., Chyła J., Wojciechowska C., Janion M., Polewczyk A. Complications of electrotherapy – the dark side of treatment with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Adv. Interv. Kardiol. 2018; 14 (1): 15–25. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2018.74351
- Janosik D.L., Redd R.M., Buckingham T.A., Blum R.I., Wiens R.D., Kennedy H.L. Utility of ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting pacemaker dysfunction in the early postimplantation period. Am. J. Cardiol. 1987; 60 (13): 1030–5. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90347-x
- Bartsch C., Irnich W., Risse M., Junge M., Weiler G. Postmortem in situ diagnosis of pacemakers and electrodes to detect dysfunction. Leg. Med. (Tokyo). 2003; 5 (1): 397–400. DOI: 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00171-2
- Bartsch C., Irnich W., Junge M., Stertmann W.A., Risse M., Weiler G. Post-mortem evaluation of 415 pacemakers: in situ measurements and bench tests. Europace. 2005; 7 (2): 175–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.12.010
- Maisel W.H., Moynahan M., Zuckerman B.D., Gross T.P., Tovar O.H., Tillman D.B. et al. Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports. JAMA. 2006; 295 (16): 1901–6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.16.1901
- Belvin D., Hirschl D., Jain V.R., Godelman A., Stein M.W., Gross J.N. et al. Chest radiographs are valuable in demonstrating clinically significant pacemaker complications that require reoperation. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2011; 62 (4): 288–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2010.04.016
- Tseng Z.H., Hayward R.M., Clark N.M., Mulvanny C.G., Colburn B.J., Ursell P.C. et al. Sudden death in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015; 175 (8): 1342–50. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2641
- Markewitz A. Bundesfachgruppe Herzschrittmacher und Defibrillatoren. Jahresbericht 2017 des Deutschen Herzschrittmacher- und DefibrillatorRegisters – Teil 2: Implantierbare KardioverterDefibrillatoren (ICD). Herzschrittmach. Elektrophysiol. 2019; 30 (4): 389–403. DOI: 10.1007/s00399-019-00648-9
- Kallinen L.M., Hauser R.G., Lee K.W., Almquist A.K., Katsiyiannis W.T., Tang C.Y. et al. Failure of impedance monitoring to prevent adverse clinical events caused by fracture of a recalled high-voltage implantable cardioverterdefibrillator lead. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5 (6): 775–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.039
- Nguyen T., Rinaldi C.A. Pacemaker syndrome due to atrial lead fracture. Clin. Case Rep. 2019; 8 (1): 226–7. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2579
- Khurwolah M.R., Vezi B.Z. Pacemaker syndrome with sub-acute left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a patient with a dual-chamber pacemaker: consequence of lead switch at the header. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2017; 28 (2): 134–6. DOI: 10.5830/CVJA2016-081
- Nguyen U.C., Crijns HJ.GM. Undersensing, asynchronous pacing, and ventricular fibrillation. Europace. 2019; 21 (7): 1078. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz009
- Topf A., Motloch L.J., Kraus J., Danmayr F., Mirna M., Schernthaner C. et el. Exercise-related T-wave oversensing: an underestimated cause of reduced exercise capacity in a pacemaker-dependent patient – a case report and review of the literature. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 2020; 59 (1): 67–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00698-6
- Ryan J.D., Tempel N.D., Engle D.D., Hayes D.L., Cha Y.M., Asirvatham S.J. Oversensing of transthoracic excitation stimuli in contemporary pacemakers. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018; 41 (2): 161–6. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13269
- Frontera A., Klotz N., Martin R., Haïssaguerre M., Ritter P., Bordachar P. Transient undersensing of the ventricular lead during abdominal ultrasound as cause of ventricular fibrillation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018; 41 (7): 880. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13362
- Theodoropoulos K.C., Liakopoulou A., Tsagkaropoulos S., Kassimis G., Antonitsis P., Anastasiadis K. Under-sensing by a temporary pacemaker after cardiac surgery and ventricular fibrillation. Lancet. 2022; 399 (10325): 677. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02443-0
- Pai P.G., Hegde N.N. Troubleshooting a pacemaker output failure: a case report. J. Electrocardiol. 2021; 66: 148–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.04.008
- Montgomery J.A., Ellis C.R. Longevity of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 2018; 10 (1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2017.11.001
- Munawar D.A., Mahajan R., Linz D., Wong G.R., Khokhar K.B., Thiyagarajah A. et al. Predicted longevity of contemporary cardiac implantable electronic devices: a call for industry-wide "standardized" reporting. Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15 (12): 1756–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.029
- Hadjis A., Proietti R., Essebag V. Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices using three leads by cephalic vein dissection approach. Europace. 2017; 19 (9): 1514–20. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw276
- Mond H.G., Freitag G. The cardiac implantable electronic device power source: evolution and revolution. Pac. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2014; 37 (12): 1728–45. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12526
- Mittal S., Wilkoff B.L., Poole J.E., Kennergren C., Wright D.J., Berman B.J. et al. Low-temperature electrocautery reduces adverse effects from secondary cardiac implantable electronic device procedures: insights from the WRAP-IT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18 (7): 1142–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.033
- Wasserlauf J., Esheim T., Jarett N.M., Chan E.K.Y., Schaller R.D., Garcia FC. et al. Avoiding damage to transvenous leads – a comparison of electrocautery techniques and two insulated electrocautery blades. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018; 41 (12): 1593–9. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13519
- Kakouros N., Kakouros S.N. Pacemaker malfunction risks within the electromagnetically rich hospital environment. Hellenic. J. Cardiol. 2018; 59 (4): 247–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.11.009
- Lee J.Z., Mulpuru S.K., Shen W.K. Leadless pacemaker: performance and complications. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2018; 28 (2): 130–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.08.001
- Pakarinen S., Oikarinen L., Toivonen L. Shortterm implantation-related complications of cardiac rhythm management device therapy: a retrospective single-centre 1-year survey. Europace. 2010; 12 (1): 103–8. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup361
- Palmisano P., Accogli M., Zaccaria M., Luzzi G., Nacci F., Anaclerio M. et al. Rate, causes, and impact on patient outcome of implantable device complications requiring surgical revision: large population survey from two centres in Italy. Europace. 2013; 15 (4): 531–40. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus337
- Kikuchi K., Abe H., Nagatomo T., Nakashima Y. Microdislodgment: a likely mechanism of pacing failure with high impedence small area electrodes. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2003; 26 (7 Pt1): 1541–3. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1- 00224.x
- Schulz N., Püschel K., Turk E.E. Fatal complications of pacemaker and implantable cardioverterdefibrillator implantation: medical malpractice? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2009; 8 (4): 444–8. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2008.189043
- Morales J.L., Nava S., Márquez M.F., González J., Gómez-Flores J., Colín L. et al. Idiopathic lead migration: concept and variants of an uncommon cause of cardiac implantable electronic device dysfunction. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2017; 3 (11): 1321–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.015
- Wynn G.J., Weston C., Cooper R.J., Somauroo J.D. Inadvertent left ventricular pacing through a patent foramen ovale: identification, management and implications for postpacemaker implantation checks. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 2013: bcr2012008312. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2012-008312
- Ozel E., Osztheimer I., Ozturk A., Gellér L., Ozcan E.E. Percutaneous right atrial pacemaker lead repositioning using a regular deflectable ablation catheter. Adv. Interv. Cardiol. 2016; 12 (2): 183–4. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2016.59374 39. Khan M.N., Joseph G., Khaykin Y., Ziada K.M., Wilkoff B.L. Delayed lead perforation: a disturbing trend. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2005; 28 (3): 251–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40003.x
- Refaat M.M., Hashash J.G., Shalaby A.A. Late perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads: clinical presentation, diagnostic clues, and management. Clin. Cardiol. 2010; 33 (8): 466–75. DOI: 10.1002/clc.20803
- Kotsakou M., Kioumis I., Lazaridis G., Pitsiou G., Lampaki S., Papaiwannou A. et al. Pacemaker insertion. Ann. Transl. Med. 2015; 3 (3): 42. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.02.06
- Piekarz J., Lelakowski J., Rydlewska A., Majewski J. Heart perforation in patients with permanent cardiac pacing – pilot personal observations. Arch. Med. Sci. 2012; 8 (1): 70–4. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2012.27284 43. Oda T., Kono T., Akaiwa K., Takahara Y., Yasuoka C., Nakamura K. Surgical repair of subacute right ventricular perforation after pacemaker implantation. Case Rep. Cardiol. 2017; 2017: 3242891. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3242891
- Verevetinov A.N., Tarsyuk E.S., Dorovskikh I.E., Vakhnenko Yu.V., Nikitin V.N., Urazova G.E. et al. Clinical case of late asymptomatic right ventricular perforation when implanted with a permanent pacemaker. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2019; 23 (4): 91–7 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21688/1681-3472-2019-4-91-97
- Banaszewski M., Ste,pińska J. Right heart perforation by pacemaker leads. Arch. Med. Sci. 2012; 8 (1): 11–3. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2012.27273
- Amara W., Cymbalista M., Sergent J. Delayed right ventricular perforation with a pacemaker lead into subcutaneous tissues. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010; 103 (1): 53–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2008.06.008
- Polewczyk A., Kutarski A., Tomaszewski A., Polewczyk M., Janion M. Late complications of electrotherapy – a clinical analysis of indications for transvenous removal of endocardial leads: a single centre experience. Kardiol. Pol. 2013; 71 (4): 366–72. DOI: 10.5603/KP.2013.0064
- Nayeri A.N., Pavri B.B. Abrupt increase in impedance measurements as detected via remote monitoring: what is the cause? HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2015; 1 (2): 51–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr. 2014.12.001
- Adelstein E., Zhang L., Nazeer H., Loka A., Steckman D. Increased incidence of electrical abnormalities in a pacemaker lead family. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2021; 32 (4): 1111–21. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14941
- Chabin X., Taghli-Lamallem O., Mulliez A., Bordachar P., Jean F., Futier E. Bioimpedance analysis is safe in patients with implanted cardiac electronic devices. Clin. Nutr. 2019; 38 (2): 806–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.029
- St.Jude Medical Company. Introduction to Autocapture. Pacesetter AB A -S171 95 SOLNA. Sweden. Ordering No. 63 22 536 E508E. P. 9.
- Barold S.S., Herweg B. The effect of hyperkalaemia on cardiac rhythm devices. Europace. 2014; 16 (4): 467–76. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut383
- Osmolovsky A.N. Temporary transvenous endocardial pacing: method of endocardial electrode reposition in the right ventricular cavity of the heart. Kazan Medical Journal. 2016; 97 (3): 453–7 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17750/KMJ2016-453
- Amit G., Wang J., Connolly S.J., Glikson M., Hohnloser S., Wright D.J. et al. Apical versus nonapical lead: is ICD lead position important for successful defibrillation? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (5): 581–6. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12952
- Pang B.J., Joshi S.B., Lui E.H., Tacey M.A., Ling L.H., Alison J. et al. Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2014; 37 (4): 495–504. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12301
- Sabbagh E., Abdelfattah T., Karim M.M., Farah A., Grubb B., Karim S. Causes of failure to capture in pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J. Innov. Card. Rhythm. Manag. 2020; 11 (2): 4013–7. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2020.110207
- Martínez-Losas P., Higueras J., Gómez-Polo J.C., Brabyn P., Ferrer J.M., Can~adas V. et al. The influence of computerized interpretation of an electrocardiogram reading. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2016; 34 (10): 2031–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.029
- Higueras J., Olmos C., Palacios-Rubio J., GómezPolo J.C., Martínez-Losas P., Ruiz-Pizarro V. et al. TBC: a simple algorithm to rule out abnormalities in electrocardiograms of patients with pacemakers. Cardiol. J. 2018; 27 (2): 136–41. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.007