Coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneouscoronary intervention in stable ischemic heart disease:contemporary approach

Authors: Golukhova E.Z.

Company: Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rublevskoe shosse, 135, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation

For correspondence:  Sign in or register.

Type:  Editorial article


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1997-3187-2019-13-2-91-97

For citation: Golukhova E.Z. Coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in stable ischemic heart disease: contemporary approach. Creative Cardiology. 2019; 13 (2): 91–7 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/ 1997-3187-2019-13-2-91-97

Received / Accepted:  20.05.2019/24.05.2019

Keywords: coronary artery bypass surgery percutaneous coronary intervention stable ischemic heart disease optimal medical therapy secondary prevention

Download
Full text:  

 

Abstract

Editorial comment covered the problems of contemporary results of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable ischemic heart disease improving the last decades. The main reason of significant long-term improvement in surgical outcomes over time, including major adverse coronary events (MACE) and non-fatal myocardial infarctions according to latest publications was the greater use of optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention.

References

  1. Diegeler A., Bordermann J., Kappert U. et al. Five-year outcome after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. Circulation. 2019; 139: 1865–71.

  2. Modolo R., Chichareon P., Kogame N. et al. Contemporary outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019; 73: 1877–86.

  3. McCarthy P.M. Outcomes after coronary artery bypass: getting better all the time. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019; 73: 1887–9.

  4. Doenst T., Haverich A., Serruys P., Bonow R.O., Kappetein P., Falk V. et al. Sigusch H. PCI and CABG for Treating Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019; 73 (8): 964–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.053

  5. Wu C., Сamacho F.T., Culliford A.T., Gold J.P. et al. A comparison of long- term mortality for off- pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2012; 5: 76–84.

  6. Lamy A., Devereaux P.J., Prabhakaran D., Taggart D.P., Hu S., Straka Z. et al. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016; 375: 2359–68. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564

  7. Shroyer A.L., Hattler B., Wagner T.H., Collins J.F., Baltz J.H., Quin J.A. et al. Veterans Affairs ROOBY-FS Group. Five-year outcomes after onpump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017; 377 (7): 623–32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614341

About Authors

Elena Z. Golukhova, Dr Med. Sc., Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Department, Deputy Chief Editor of the Journal, ORCID

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery