The immediate results of coronary artery bypassgrafting, depending on revascularizationat simultaneous interventions on brachiocephalicarteries

Authors: A.A. Melikulov, V.Yu. Merzlyakov, I.V. Klyuchnikov, A.I. Skopin, N.A. Darvish, S.K. Mamedova, M.F. Akhmedova, A.K. Zhalilov, M.A. Salomov

Company: Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rublevskoe shosse, 135, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation

For correspondence:  Sign in or register.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1997-3187-2017-11-4-304-314

For citation: Melikulov A.A., Merzlyakov V.Yu., Klyuchnikov I.V., Skopin A.I., Darvisch N.A., Mamedova S.K., khmedovа M.F., Zhalilov A.K., Salomov M.A. The immediate results of coronary artery bypass grafting, depending on revascularization at simultaneous interventions on brachiocephalic arteries. Kreativnaya Kardiologiya (Creative Cardiology). 2017; 11 (4): 304–14 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1997-3187-2017-11-4-304-314

Received / Accepted:  16.10.2017/30.10.2017

Keywords: myocardial revascularization ischemic heart disease stroke carotid endarterectomy

Full text:  

 

Abstract

Objective. Comparison of immediate results of one-stage operations on brachiocephalic and coronary arteries in patients with high surgical risk in performing on pump coronary artery bypass and off pump coronary artery bypass.

Material and methods. The study included 309 patients, divided into two groups. In group 1, 169 patients underwent simultaneous intervention with coronary bypass surgery on the operating heart and carotid endarterectomy. Accordingly, 140 patients in group 2 underwent conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and carotid endarterectomy. For all clinical parameters, the patients of both groups were statistically comparable and did not differ significantly.

Results.
Therefore, the total duration of the operation was 6.22±1.5 h in the first off pump coronary bypass group, 5.9±1.3 h in the second group conventional CABG, and did not differ significantly (p=0.072). The frequency of cerebrovascular complications in both groups did not have a statistically significant difference. Hospital mortality in the I group was 4.7% (8 cases), and in the second group – 9.3% (13 cases) (p=0.1235). In the off pump coronary bypass group, single-stage intervention revealed a statistically significant benefit in terms of the frequency of the need for hemodialysis, the need for prolonged ventilation, as well as for a set of complications in the form of a primary endpoint (death + myocardial + stroke + hemodialysis + redo bypass).

Conclusions. Thus, in the presence of indications for performing simultaneous operations on coronary and brachiocephalic arterial pools in patients with high surgical risk, off pump coronary artery bypass is a justified method with an acceptable profile of efficacy and safety in a specialized hospital with an experienced surgeon and a trained operating team.

References

  1. Bockeria L.A., Pirtskhalaishvili Z.K., Sigaev I.Yu., Darvish N.A., Serguladze T.N. Modern approaches to diagnostics and surgerytreatment of brachycephalic arteries in patients with ischemic heart disease. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk (Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences). 2012; 10: 4–11 (in Russ.).

  2. Gansera B., Schmidtler F., Weingartner J. et al. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery: early results of 386 patients. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012; 60 (8): 508–16.

  3. Aydin E., Ozen Y., Sarikaya S., Yukseltan I. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy can be performed with low mortality rates. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2014; 25: 130–3: DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2014-018.

  4. Byrne J., Darling R.C., 3rd, Roddy S.P. Combined carotid endarterec-tomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with asymptomatic highgrade stenoses: an analysis of 758 procedures. J. Vasc. Surg. 2006; 44 (1): 67–72.

  5. Huh J., Wall M., Soltero E. Treatment of combined coronary and carotid artery disease. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2003; 18: 447–453.

  6. Khaitan L., Sutter F.P., Goldman S.M. et al. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000; 69: 421–4.

  7. Prasad S.M., Li S., Rankin J.S., O’Brien S.M. et al. Current outcomes of simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in North America. World J. Surg. 2010; 34 (10): 2292–8.

  8. Pribán V., Fiedler J., Chlouba V., Mokrácek A., Setina M. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary revascularization: indications and results. Rozhl. Chir. 2011; 90 (1): 67–72.

  9. Alshibaya M.D., Kuperberg E.B., Kostyukov V.V. Methods of protectioncerebral blood flow during simultaneous operations correction coronary and brachiocephalic vessels. Grudnaya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya (Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery). 1996; 1: 21–4 (in Russ).

  10. Shishehbor M.H., Venkatachalam S., Sun Z., Rajeswaran J., Kapadia S.R., Bajzer C. et al. A direct comparison of early and late outcomes with three approaches to carotid revascularization and open heart surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013; 62: 1948–56.

  11. Versaci F., Reimers B., Del Giudice C., Schofer J., Giacomin A., Sacc`a S. et al. Simultaneous hybrid revascularization by carotid stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting: the SHARP study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009; 2: 393–401.

  12. Eckstein H.H., Reiff T., Ringleb P., Jansen O., Mansmann U., Hacke W. SPACE 2 Investigators. SPACE-2: a missed opportunity to compare carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016; 51: 761–5.

  13. Mao Z., Zhong X., Yin J., Zhao Z., Hu X., Hackett M.L. Predictors associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. J. Neurol. Sci. 2015; 357: 1–7.

  14. Illuminati G., Ricco J.B., Cali`o F., Pacti M.A., Miraldi F., Frati G. et al. Short-term results of a randomized trial examining timing of carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Vasc. Surg. 2011; 54: 993–9; discussion 998.

  15. Selim M. Perioperative stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 356: 706–13.

  16. Pawlaczyk R., Swietlik D., Lango R., Rogowski J. Off-pump coronary surgery may reduce stroke, respiratory failure, and mortality in octogenarians. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012; 94: 29–37.

  17. A Japanese Associate for Coronary Artery Surgery (JACAS). Coronary artery surgery results 2013, in Japan. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014; 20: 332–4.

  18. McCarthy G.S., Hedenstierna G. Arterial oxygenation during artificial ventilation. The effect of airway closure and of its prevention by positive end-expiratory pressure. Acta Anaesth. Scand. 1978; 22 (6): 563–9.

About Authors

  • Melikulov Alisher Almardonovich, Cand. Med. Sc., Cardiac Surgeon, orcid.org/0000-0002-5164-9702;
  • Merzlyakov Vadim Yur'evich, Dr Med. Sc., Head of Department, orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-3723;
  • Klyuchnikov Ivan Vyacheslavovich, Dr Med. Sc., Professor, Chief Researcher, orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-9639;
  • Skopin Anton Ivanovich, Cand. Med. Sc., Leading Researcher, orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-0755;
  • Darvish Nedal Akhmedovich, Cand. Med. Sc., Head of Department, orcid.org/0000-0002-2152-4730;
  • Mamedova Sevindzh Kamilovna Kizy, Cand. Med. Sc., Junior Researcher, orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-0807;
  • Akhmedova Madina Fatkhullaevna, Cand. Med. Sc., Cardiologist, orcid.org/0000-0002-6184-6742;
  • Zhalilov Adkham Kakhramonovich, Cand. Med. Sc., Applicant, orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-6371;
  • Salomov Makhmadsharif Abdusamadovich, Applicant, orcid.org/0000-0002-8602-3152

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery