Register
Forgot your password?

Gender features of diagnosis non-obstructive coronary artery disease and factors associated with its detection

Authors: Korok E.V., Sumin A.N., Barbarash L.S.

Company: Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases; Sosnovyy bulvar, 6, Kemerovo, 650002, Russian Federation

For correspondence:  Sign in or register.

Type:  Original study


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15275/kreatkard.2016.02.04

For citation: Korok E.V., Sumin A.N., Barbarash L.S. Gender features of diagnosis non-obstructive coronary heart disease and factors associated with its detection. Kreativnaya Kardiologiya. 2016; 10 (2): 136-149 (in Russian)

Keywords: gender features nonobstructive coronary artery disease coronary angiography

Full text:  

 

Abstract

Objective. To study gender-specific diagnostics obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and factors associated with its detection during routine coronary angiography (CAG).

Material and methods. The retrospective study included 711 medical records of patients undergoing routine CAG. According to the gender were formed 2 groups: women (n=264, 63 [57; 66] years) and male (n=447, 60 [55; 67] years).

Results. Myocardial infarction (MI) in history was dominated by the men (p<0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) was higher in women (p<0,001). Patients with suspected CAD and valvular heart diseases (VHD) prevailed among women (p=0.001), and previous MI – among men (p<0.001). The lesion of the peripheral arterial basins, rhythm and conduction disturbances (RCD) did not differ between groups. The absence of coronary artery (CA) lesions often can be found among women (p<0.001) and significant stenosis of CA – in men (p<0.001). Typical and atypical angina met with the same frequency in both groups, and cardialgia – more common in women (p=0.004). Pretest probability of CAD was higher in males (p<0.001).

Independent predictors of intact CA in women is the presence RCD and cardialgia and increasing age, the presence of diabetes and angina increased the risk of atherosclerotic coronary lesions (p<0.05). With the absence of CA stenosis in men associated VHD, RCD, atypical angina and cardialgia, though the presence of typical angina, diabetes, decreased LV EF reduced probability of detecting intact CA (p<0.05).

Conclusion. According to the CAG nonobstructive coronary artery disease were detected in 61% of women and 37.3% of men, no damage CA – at 49.6 and 23%. Patients with suspected CAD and VHD prevailed among women, and patients with a history of MI – in men. Thus factors associated with detection of intact CA in CAG in patients of both sexes were the presence of RCD, cardialgia; and in men – the presence of VHD, atypical angina and increase of LV EF.

References

  1. Dharampal A.S., Papadopoulou S.L., Rossi A., Weustink A.C., Mollet N., Meijboom W.B. et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography accuracy in women and men at low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease. Eur. Radiol. 2012; 22 (11): 2415–23.
  2. Canpolat U., Özer N. Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Anadolu Kardiyol. Derg. 2014; 14 (8): 741–6.
  3. Rademaker A.A., Danad I., Groothuis J.G., Heymans M.W., Marcu C.B., Knaapen P. et al. Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter? Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2014; 21 (11): 1443–50.
  4. Abdelmoneim S.S., Bernier M., Hagen M.E., Eifert-Rain S., Bott-Kitslaar D., Wilansky S. et al. A multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the use of contrast stress echocardiography in early menopausal women at risk for coronary artery disease: trial design and baseline findings. J. Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013; 22 (2): 173–83.
  5.  Gaysenok O.V., Martsevich S.Yu. Determination of indications for coronary angiography in patients without clinical manifestations of the disease, and patients with stable angina. Kardiologiya. 2014; 10: 57–62 (in Russian).
  6. Gulati M., Cooper-DeHoff R.M., McClure C., Johnson B.D., Shaw L.J., Handberg E.M. et al. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch. Intern Med. 2009; 169 (9): 843–50.
  7. Ko D.T., Tu J.V., Austin P.C., Wijeysundera H.C., Samadashvili Z., Guo H. et al. Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario. JAMA. 2013; 310 (2): 163–9.
  8. Levitt K., Guo H., Wijeysundera H.C., Ko D.T., Natarajan M.K., Feindel C.M. et al. Predictors of normal coronary arteries at coronary angiography. Am. Heart J. 2013; 166 (4): 694–700.
  9. Patel M.R., Dai D., Hernandez A.F., Douglas P.S., Messenger J., Garratt K.N. et al. Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice. Am. Heart J. 2014; 167 (6): 846–52.
  10. Hansen K.W., Soerensen R., Madsen M., Madsen J.K., Jensen J.S., von Kappelgaard L.M. et al. Developments in the invasive diagnostic-therapeutic cascade of women and men with acute coronary syndromes from 2005 to 2011: a nationwide cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015; 5 (6): e007785. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007785.
  11. Suessenbacher A., Wanitschek M., Dörler J., Neururer S., Frick M., Pachinger O. et al. Sex differences in independent factors associated with coronary artery disease. Wien Klin. Wochenschr. 2014; 126 (21–22): 718–26.
  12. Arakelyan V.S., Bortnikova N.V., Papitashvili V.G. Impact of cardiac risk factors on treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease and aortoiliac lesions. Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniy. 2013; 4: 77–82 (in Russian).
  13. Sumin A.N., Korok E.V., Sin'kov M.A., Nagirnyak O.A., Chichkova T.Yu., Barbarash L.S. The incidence of intact coronary arteries, depending on the indications for scheduled coronary angiography. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2015; 2 (130): 52–9 (in Russian).
  14. Thalji N.M., Suri R.M., Daly R.C., Dearani J.A., Burkhart H.M., Park S.J. et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease risk in 5463 patients undergoing cardiac surgery: when is preoperative coronary angiography necessary? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013; 146 (5): 1055–63, 1064.
  15. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart J. 2012; 33: 2451–96.
  16. Fihn S.D., Gardin J.M., Abrams J., Berra K., Blankenship J.C., Dallas A.P. et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012; 126: e354–471.
  17. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart J. 2013; 34 (38): 2949–3003.
  18. Wolk M.J., Bailey S.R., Doherty J.U., Douglas P.S., Hendel R.C., Kramer C.M. et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/ HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014; 63 (4): 380–406.
  19. Cheng V.Y., Berman D.S., Rozanski A., Dunning A.M., Achenbach S., Al-Mallah M. et al. Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM). Circulation. 2011; 124 (22): 2423–32.
  20. Hannan E.L., Samadashvili Z., Cozzens K., Walford G., Holmes D.R. Jr, Jacobs A.K. et al. Appropriateness of diagnostic catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease in New York State. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014; 7 (1): 19–27.
  21. Ko D.T., Wijeysundera H.C., Udell J.A., Vaccarino V., Austin P.C., Guo H. et al. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease in men and women. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014; 30 (7): 820–6.
  22. Hong S.N., Mieres J.H., Jacobs J.E., Babb J.S., Patel P., Srichai M.B. Assessing coronary disease in symptomatic women by the Morise score. J. Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012; 21 (8): 843–50.
  23. Banerjee A., Newman D.R., Van den Bruel A., Heneghan C. Diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2012; 66 (5): 477–92.
  24. Yorgun H., Tokgözˇglu L., Canpolat U., Gürses K.M., Bozdaˇg G., Yapici Z. et al. The cardiovascular effects of premature ovarian failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013; 168: 506–10.
  25. Naya M., Murthy V.L., Taqueti V.R., Foster C.R., Klein J., Garber M. et al. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography. J. Nucl. Med. 2014; 55 (2): 248–55.
  26. Cury R.C., Techasith T., Feuchtner G., Dabus G. Cardiovascular disease and stroke in women: role of radiology. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 265–73.
  27. Gebker R., Jahnke C., Hucko T., Manka R., Mirelis J.G., Hamdan A. et al. Dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. Heart. 2010; 96: 616–20.
  28. Klem I., Greulich S., Heitner J.F., Kim H., Vogelsberg H., Kispert E.M. et al. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. JACC. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2008; 1 (4): 436–45.
  29. Borges Santos M., Ferreira A.M., de Araújo Goncalves P., Raposo L., Campante Teles R., Almeida M. et al. Diagnostic yield of current referral strategies for elective coronary angiography in suspected coronary artery diseasean analysis of the ACROSS registry. Rev. Port. Cardiol. 2013; 32 (6): 483–8.
  30. Chinnaiyan K.M., Raff G.L., Goraya T., Ananthasubramaniam K., Gallagher M.J., Abidov A. et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography after stress testing: results from a multicenter, statewide registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 59 (7): 688–95.
  31. Bettencourt N., Rocha J., Carvalho M., Leite D., Toschke A.M., Melica B. et al. Multislice computed tomography in the exclusion of coronary artery disease in patients with presurgical valve disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2009; 2: 306–13.
  32. Abbasi S.H., Kassaian S.E. Women and coronary artery disease. Part I: basic considerations. J. Tehran. Heart Cent. 2011; 6 (3): 109–16.
  33. Banks K., Lo M., Khera A. Angina in Women without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2010; 6 (1): 71–81.

About Authors

  • Korok Ekaterina Viktorovna, MD, PhD, Research Associate;
  • Sumin Aleksey Nikolaevich, MD, DM, Chief of Department;
  • Barbarash Leonid Semenovich, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Research Associate

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery


Sort by